Glaxosmithkline $3 bn Settlement
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : BECG126
Case Length : 21 Pages
Period : 1998-2012
Organization : GlaxoSmithKline
Pub Date : 2013
Teaching Note :Available
Countries : US
Industry : Pharmaceutical Industry
To download Glaxosmithkline $3 bn Settlement
case study
(Case Code: BECG126) click on the button below and select the case from the list of available cases:
OR
Buy With PayPal
|
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 500 ;
For delivery through Shipping & Handling Charges extra: Rs. 500 +Shipping & Handling Charges extra
»Business Ethics Case Studies » Case Studies Collection
» ICMR Home
» View Detailed Pricing Info » How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies » Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
<< Previous
Global pharmaceutical company, Glaxo1 SmithKline2 (GSK) on 02 July 2012 had agreed to pay $3 billions in fines and pleaded guilty to criminal charges for illegally promoting its best selling anti-depressants drugs for unapproved uses to Food and Drug Administration3 (FDA)4. The pharmaceutical company was also accused of overcharging the US national health care program, Medicaid5 , and for allegedly paying kickbacks to doctors who prescribed some of its drugs.Though GSK did not admit to any wrong doing in the civil settlement, according to the US Justice Department, on July 2, 2012, the pharmaceutical company had agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges for promoting its anti-depressants drugs Paxil and Wellbutrin for children and adolescents despite the drugs not being approved by the FDA.6
|
|
The company also pleaded guilty for failing to report safety data about its top selling diabetic drug Avandia. The diabetes drug was banned in the year 2007 in Europe after it was found that its intake sharply increased the risk of having heart attacks and congestive heart failure. The drug was also restricted in the US on the same grounds.
The pharmaceutical firm pleaded guilty to three counts of criminal misdemeanor - two counts to introducing the misbranded drugs, Paxil and Wellbutrin, into interstate commerce and one count to failing to report on the safety data about the drug Avandia to the FDA. GSK agreed to pay $3 bn as fines to absolve from criminal and civil liabilities.7
The US Justice Department in its notification about the settlement, described it as the largest healthcare fraud settlement in US history.8 Briefing the press about the settlement charges, James M. Cole, deputy attorney general of the US Justice Department, Washington, said that the fine was unprecedented in both size and scope and was a clear warning to pharmaceutical companies committing healthcare frauds.9 At a press conference after the settlement, assistant attorney general, Stuart F. Delerly, said that the fine was levied not only to punish the wrong doer and recover taxpayer dollars but also to ensure GSK’s future compliance with the law. GSK CEO Sir Andrew Witty (Witty) in a press note commented that the company had learned from the mistakes that it had made.10
Introduction Contd...- Next Page>>
|
|